Thank you for taking a few minutes
to complete our satisfaction questionnaire:
|
|
Optional
itens: |
|
Name:
|
|
Institution Name:
|
|
Institution
Type:
|
|
SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE: |
|
1 - Where are you located?
Brazil.
Please, specify the city:
Other.
Please, specify the country:
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 – Click the appropriate button corresponding to your answer: |
|
Product (click on the name to each product) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very useful |
Useful |
Not very useful |
Never used |
I do not know |
|
Presentation for Investors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEST Presentations - Brazil: Excellence in Securities Transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Investor’s Handout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Borrowing Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Public Debt Report |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Public Debt Monthly Report |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The National Treasury Result |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reports |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 – Please classify each of the following products. In case you do not know it, please disregard.
|
|
|
|
a) Presentation for Investors
How often do you access it?
|
| |
|
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Poor |
|
Appearance (layout, graphic, charts, colors, etc) |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of slides |
|
|
|
|
|
Information about Macroeconomic Aspects |
|
|
|
|
|
Information about Fiscal Aspects |
|
|
|
|
|
Information about Public Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement of its purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
Easiness of access |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments, mainly for Average and Poor:
|
|
In your opinion, is there any topic that should be included or excluded? Which one(s)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b)
BEST Presentations - Brazil: Excellence in Securities Transactions
|
| |
|
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Poor |
|
Appearance (layout, graphic, charts, colors, etc) |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of slides |
|
|
|
|
|
Range of content |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement of its purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
Easiness of access |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments, mainly for Average and Poor:
|
|
In your opinion, is there any topic that should be included or excluded? Which one(s)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c)
Foreign Investor’s Handout
|
| |
|
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Poor |
|
Range of content |
|
|
|
|
|
Easiness of understanding |
|
|
|
|
|
Explanatory notes |
|
|
|
|
|
Easiness of access |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments, mainly for Average and Poor:
|
|
In your opinion, is there any topic that should be included or excluded? Which one(s)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d)
Annual Borrowing Plan
|
| |
|
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Poor |
|
Range of content |
|
|
|
|
|
Appearance (layout, graphic, charts, colors, etc) |
|
|
|
|
|
Explanatory notes |
|
|
|
|
|
Timing |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement of its purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
Easiness of understanding... |
|
|
|
|
|
Easiness of access |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments, mainly for Average and Poor:
|
|
In your opinion, is there any topic that should be included or excluded? Which one(s)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e)
Annual Public Debt Report
|
| |
|
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Poor |
|
Range of content |
|
|
|
|
|
Appearance (layout, graphic, charts, colors, etc) |
|
|
|
|
|
Explanatory notes |
|
|
|
|
|
Timing |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement of its purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
Easiness of understanding |
|
|
|
|
|
Easiness of access |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments, mainly for Average and Poor:
|
|
In your opinion, is there any topic that should be included or excluded? Which one(s)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f)
Federal Public Debt Monthly Report
|
| |
|
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Poor |
|
Range of content |
|
|
|
|
|
Appearance (layout, graphic, charts, colors, etc) |
|
|
|
|
|
Explanatory notes |
|
|
|
|
|
Timing |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement of its purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
Easiness of understanding |
|
|
|
|
|
Easiness of access |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments, mainly for Average and Poor:
|
|
In your opinion, is there any topic that should be included or excluded? Which one(s)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g)
The National Treasury Result
|
| |
|
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Poor |
|
Range of content |
|
|
|
|
|
Appearance (layout, graphic, charts, colors, etc) |
|
|
|
|
|
Explanatory notes |
|
|
|
|
|
Timing |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement of its purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
Easiness of understanding |
|
|
|
|
|
Easiness of access |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments, mainly for Average and Poor:
|
|
In your opinion, is there any topic that should be included or excluded? Which one(s)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
h)
Reports
|
| |
|
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Poor |
|
Range of content |
|
|
|
|
|
Appearance (layout, graphic, charts, colors, etc) |
|
|
|
|
|
Explanatory notes |
|
|
|
|
|
Timing |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement of its purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
Easiness of understanding |
|
|
|
|
|
Easiness of access |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments, mainly for Average and Poor:
|
|
In your opinion, is there any topic that should be included or excluded? Which one(s)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| "Investor’s Relations Group thanks you for answering this questionnaire and is committed to carefully read all responses in order to better satisfy you." |
|
|
